Question
Asked by:
ASKER
ASKER
Rating : No Rating
Questions Asked: 44
Tutorials Posted: 0
 

$20.00 Basic electronics

Q:
I need a Check also in the following problems :

a) Build a nominal 24 DC power supply with full-wave
rectification using a 18V transformer, a 4 ohms amp
bridge rectifier@50PRV, and a 200 microfarad@35 V
electrolytic capacitor for the active components in
the supply.Measuring the dc resistance of the 18V
secondary winding of the transformer you find a value
of 1.9 ohms.

(i) What will the approximate SOURCE TIME CONSTANT of the
power supply be ?

(ii) What is the largest amount of peak forward surge
current that could be expected to be 'seen ' by the
by the bridge rectifier in this power supply ?

b) A tester is operated by a single 9 V transistor battery.
What is the value of an acceptable transformer
secondary voltage in order to make this tester line-
operated via a power supply, assuming you'll add just a
single silicon diode rectifier and one capacitor for
this project ?


c)You connect a milliammeter in series with a fresh 9V
battery and the battery clip to a transistor tester: you
find that the maximum current drawn while testing a good
tansistor is 35 mA.
What the apparent load resistance of the tester that
will be presented to your home-brew power supply ?

d)You are constructing a simple,nominal 9V DC power supply
to power a small battery-operated weather radio.
By connecting a milliammeter in series with a fresh 9V
battey and the radio's battery clip, with the radio
playing loudly you find a maximum current drawn
at 9 volts is 6mA , so you decide to use a transformer and
a half-wave rectifier to produce the nominal 9V output
from the supply.
What i the MINIMUM size filter capacitor suitable for
use with this supply ?






 


   
   
   
   
 
Available Tutorials to this Question
Posted by:
 

$20.00 "Basic Electronics"

  • This tutorial hasn't been purchased yet.
  • Posted on Jul 20, 2009 at 12:06:46PM
A:
Preview: ... ame "circuit" implies that the structure is closed, something like a loop. That is all very well, but this answer immediately raises a new question: "What is an electric current?" Again, the name "current" indicates that it refers to some type of flow, and in this case we mean a flow of electric charge, which is usually just called charge because electric charge is really the only kind there is. Finally we come to the basic question:<br><br>What is Charge?<br><br> <br><br>No one knows what charge really is anymore than anyone knows what gravity is. Both are models, constructions, fabrications if you like, to describe and represent something that can be measured in the real world, specifically a force. Gravity is the name for a force between masses that we can feel and measure. Early workers observed that bodies in "certain electrical condition" also exerted forces on one another that they could measure, and they invented charge to explain their observations. Amazingly, only three simple postulates or assumptions, plus some experimental observations, are necessary to explain all electrical phenomena. Everything: currents, electronics, radio waves, and light. Not many things are so simple, so it is worth stating the three postulates clearly.<br>Charge exists. <br><br>We just invent the name to represent the source of the physical force that can be observed. The assumption is that the more charge something has, the more force will be exerted. Charge is measured in units of Coulombs, abbreviated C. The unit was named to honor Charles Augustin Coulomb (1736-1806) the French aristocrat and engineer who first measured the force between charged objects using a sensitive torsion balance he invented. Coulomb lived in a time of political unrest and new ideas, the age of Voltaire and Rousseau. Fortunately, Coulomb completed most of his work before the revolution and prudently left Paris with the storming of the Bastille.<br>Charge comes in two styles.<br><br>We call the two styles positive charge, + , and (you guessed it) negative charge, - . Charge also comes in lumps of 1.6 ×10-19C , which is about two ten-million-trillionths of a Coulomb. The discrete nature of charge is not important for this discussion, but it does serve to indicate that a Coulomb is a LOT of charge.<br>Charge is conserved.<br><br>You cannot create it and you cannot annihilate it. You can, however, neutralize it. Early workers observed experimentally that if they took equal amounts of positive and negative charge and combined them on some object, then that object neither exerted nor responded to electrical forces; effectively it had zero net charge. This experiment suggests that it might be possible to take uncharged, or neutral, material and to separate somehow the latent positive and negative charges. If you have ever rubbed a balloon on wool to make it stick to the wall, you have separated charges using mechanical action.<br><br>Those are the three postulates. Now we will present some of the experimental findings that both led to them and amplify their significance.<br><br> <br>Voltage <br><br> <br><br>First we return to the basic assumption that forces are the result of charges. Specifically, bodies with opposite charges attract, they exert a force on each other pulling them together. The magnitude of the force is pr ...

The full tutorial is about 2750 words long .
   
Join Now or Log In
Get Tutoring
Get Paid
Academic Honesty