$15.00 A Guaranteed! Received a 100% and you will too! Well researched!
- This tutorial was purchased 6 times and rated A+ by students like you.
- Posted on Oct 02, 2008 at 10:56:46PM
A:
Preview: ... one will notice that for thousands of years marriage has meant Boy+Girl=Babies. But same-sex marriage seems fair only if you accept a philosophy of marriage that, although it's gained ground in the past several centuries, still strikes many as radical: the idea that marriage (and therefore sex) is justified not by reproduction but by love. (Graff, 2006)<br><br>8 <br>Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument. PREMISE: [pro-marriage liberals ply the rhetoric of fairness and love, as if no one will notice that for thousands of years marriage has meant Boy+Girl=Babies]. But same-sex marriage seems fair only if you accept a philosophy of marriage that, although it's gained ground in the past several centuries, still strikes many as radical: CONCLUSION: [the idea that marriage (and therefore sex) is justified not by reproduction but by love.]<br><br><br>9 <br>Is the author’s argument valid or invalid, sound or unsound, strong or weak? Explain how you determined this. <br>I believe that the author’s argument is a strong valid argument. I can determine this because most people do fall in love and then decide to get married. However, some people do justify the idea of marriage by reproduction because the majority of people who marry want to have children, so the argument is not sound. Therefore, marriage is seen as a step toward reproduction. However, since not all married couples have children or marry for the sake of having children, the argument is a strong valid argument and not a sound argument because not all the premises are true. <br><br><br>10 <br>Does the author use moral reasoning? If not, explain how you determined this. <br>The author uses moral reasoning because she assigns moral value judgments to each moral argument. For instance, she’s arguing for the legalization of same-sex marriages because same-sex couples need to be given the benefits that heterosexual couples enjoy such as sharing insurance and pension plans, and being given custodial rights over their children. This is an example of how he justifies each moral argument with moral value judgments.<br><br><br><br><br>Source 2 Title and Citation: “Same-Sex Marriage Will Undermine the Institution of Marriage”<br>Tubbs, Robert P. George and David L. "Same-Sex Marriage Will Undermine the Institution of Marriage." Sex. Mary E. Williams. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2006. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Apollo Library. 12Sept.2008 <http://find.galegroup.com/i ...
The full tutorial is about 1792 words long plus attachments.
Attachments:
crt205-appendixD.doc (123K) (Preview)
$25.00 CRT205 Week 9 Capstone CheckPoint and Final with all 4 articles (Guaranteed A+)
- This tutorial was purchased 3 times and hasn't been rated yet.
- Posted on Oct 03, 2008 at 06:56:46PM
A:
Preview: ... 9 Capstone Che ...
The full tutorial is about 13 words long plus attachments.
Attachments:
CRT205 Week 9 Capstone CheckPoint.doc (26K) (Preview)
CRT205 Week 9 Final Project- Comprehensive Argument Analysis.doc (91K) (Preview)
CRT205 Week 9 Final Project Article 1 & 2- Capital Puishment.doc (101K) (Preview)
CRT205 Week 9 Final Project- Article 3 & 4- Iraq.doc (108K) (Preview)
$25.00 CRT 205 WEEK 9 passed with all A's Critical Analysis Forms
- This tutorial was purchased 1 time and hasn't been rated yet.
- Posted on Nov 24, 2008 at 3:03:57PM
A:
Preview: ... h our educational, political and constitutional principles.”<br><br><br>8 <br>Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument. <br>Premise:<br>Religious voices must be included in the curricular conversation.<br><br>Conclusion:<br>To be consistent with our educational, political, and constitutional principles…<br><br><br>9 <br>Is the author’s argument valid or invalid, sound or unsound, strong or weak? Explain how you determined this. <br>I believe the author’s argument to be sound. <br>The premises’ being valid makes the conclusion likely to be true.<br><br>10 <br>Does the author use moral reasoning? If not, explain how you determined this. <br>The author uses moral reasoning in this article, as he believes religion ought to be given a small voice in public schools, to prevent a society full of only secular thinkers. I believe the author is using Deontological Theory because his objective is to create good by introducing more religion education into public schools.<br><br><br><br><br>Source 2 Title and Citation: Nord, Warren A. (2002). Public Schools Should Include More Religion in the Curriculum. Opposing Viewpoints: Religion in America. Ed. William Dudley. San Diego: Greenhaven Press.<br><br><br><br>1 <br>Identify the principal issue presented by the source. <br>The principle issue presented by the source is whether or not Creationism should be taught in public schools.<br><br>2 <br>Identify any examples of bias presented by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this. <br>“These and many other creationist statements unmask creationism for what it is: not a science, but a narrow-minded religious belief, immune to evidence or potential correction.” The author degrades the Creationist belief with this statement therefore it is bias.<br><br><br>3 <br>Identify any areas that are vague or ambiguous. If none exist, explain how you determined this. <br><br>1. “According to creationists, the Earth is only about 6,000 years old” This presents a vague suggestion in regard to the true age of the Earth.<br>2. “Creationists often insist that since evolution is a "theory," it is only a guess, no better than any other. However, in science, a theory is a statement of general principles that explain many facts by means of natural processes. The proposition that the planets revolve around the sun (Copernican theory) explains a great many astronomical facts and also is considered true beyond a reasonable doubt. In the same way, geological examination of rocks demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt that the earth is extremely old. The theory of evolution explains a tremendous number of biological and paleontological facts, and it, too, is true beyond a reasonable doubt. Nevertheless, all these theories could be altered or replaced if new observations yielded new scientific evidence that contradicted predictions of these theories. Creationism, on the other hand, is not even a theory because its proponents have decided in advance that no amount of evidence will change their beliefs.” This passage mostly presents vague definitions by using the words like “great many” and “extremely old.”<br>3. “Scientific literacy is in short supply among American students” This is vague because the capacity of American students and was not specific.<br><br>4 <br>Do you find the source credible? Explain your reasoning. <br>I find the source less credible. In my opinion just because the author is indeed an evolutionary biologist, does not make him an expert on how curriculum affects students.<br><br><br>5 <br>Identify and name any rhetorical devices used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this. 1. “By treating religious doctrin ...
The full tutorial is about 2640 words long .
$10.00 CRT205 FINAL PROJECT AND CAPSTONE WEEK 9-Always an A+++ Work!
- This tutorial was purchased 6 times and rated A+ by students like you.
- Posted on Jan 05, 2009 at 01:26:40PM
A:
Preview: ... uating any kind of sources. This is very important to me because with all the information out there it is very important to know the differences in their credibility. Therefore, when I read articles, I look for the sources knowledge and experience and it is almost like doing a little background check. When I see advertising on television or in the magazine, I know that their first and most important goal is to sell their product. The media is also very similar to advertising therefore; I look for any kind of slant ...
The full tutorial is about 497 words long plus attachments.
Attachments:
Final Paper CRT 205 A+!.doc (85K) (Preview)
$15.00 CRT205 - Comp. Arg. Analysis (100%) + .zip file of Webpages for all 4 sources + Capstone ChkP- Msg me for info on topics
- This tutorial hasn't been purchased yet.
- Posted on Jan 21, 2009 at 10:11:36PM
A:
Preview: ... have included a .zip file of all 4 complete Web Pages of the 4 sources/topics that I used in this assignment straight from the University of Phoenix Library.<br><br>Also I have ...
The full tutorial is about 116 words long plus attachments.
Attachments:
CRT205_Wk9Final_AppendixD.doc (115K) (Preview)
CompleteWebPageofArticles_UOPLibrary.zip (211K)
CRT205_CapCheckpoint.doc (30K) (Preview)
$10.00 Final and Capstone / Grade A on both and in the class
- This tutorial was purchased 1 time and hasn't been rated yet.
- Posted on Mar 21, 2009 at 6:47:04PM
A:
Preview: ... pstone / G ...
The full tutorial is about 12 words long plus attachments.
Attachments:
Comprehensive Argument Analysis.doc (105K) (Preview)
CRT205 Capstone CheckPoint.doc (27K) (Preview)
$5.00 CRT 205 Final - Bio-weapons/ Biological Warfare and Capitol Punishment - Received A+ and so will you!!
- This tutorial was purchased 2 times and hasn't been rated yet.
- Posted on Apr 06, 2009 at 7:39:03PM
A:
Preview: ... INAL ...
The full tutorial is about 4 words long plus attachments.
Attachments:
Final Project CRT 205.doc (102K) (Preview)
$9.99 CRT205{week 9} to help you
- This tutorial hasn't been purchased yet.
- Posted on Jun 07, 2009 at 7:53:02PM
A:
Preview: ... torial should be ...
The full tutorial is about 15 words long plus attachments.
Attachments:
week 9.zip (18K)
