Question
Asked by:
Markyc100
Markyc100
Rating : No Rating
Questions Asked: 46
Tutorials Posted: 0
 

$40.00 Bug Inc. Paper

Q:
BUG, Inc., a company based in Any State, U.S.A., designs, manufactures, and sells electronic recording devices. These devices are used by law enforcement agencies (police, FBI, etc.) to intercept and record sounds and voices. The equipment taps into telephone wires, cell phone transmissions, and picks up sounds and voices through the walls of a house or in open-air locations through the use of a remote microphone. Part of the equipment is driven by software written by BUG employees. BUG has exclusive contracts with most state and federal law enforcement agencies throughout the United States. BUG is thinking about expanding its sales to international markets. Currently, half of its manufacturing plants are in foreign countries and half are in the U.S. The company’s logo is a ladybug wearing a set of headphones.

b. Write a 700-1,400-word paper answering the following questions:

1) Define the different type(s) of legal protections BUG should have for its intellectual property. Explain why these protections are necessary.

2) Earlier this year, WIRETAP, Inc., a relatively new company trying to compete with BUG, sent one of its employees, Steve, to BUG to get a job. BUG, not realizing Steve was an employee of WIRETAP, hired him to work in its research and development department located in Any State, U.S.A. While working at BUG, Steve forwarded any BUG e-mail he received to WIRETAP. This included e-mail between BUG officers (both domestic and abroad) that Steve intercepted using his hacking ability. At the end of each week, Steve met with his boss at WIRETAP and gave him all the information he obtained about the BUG product lines.

a) Discuss in detail what type(s), if any, of civil liability Steve may face if caught.

b) Discuss in detail what type(s), if any, of civil liability WIRETAP may face if caught.

3) (See situation b.-2 for background information.) Walter, a security guard for BUG, learns that Steve really works for WIRETAP. Walter takes Steve to a small soundproof room where he keeps him for six hours. During this time, Walter continues to ask Steve what he is doing at BUG and what information he has given to WIRETAP. Walter tells Steve that he will hurt him if he does not tell him everything. Steve finally tells Walter what he wants to know. Walter then lets Steve go home.

a) Has Walter committed any torts? If so, explain.

b) Discuss any liability BUG may have for Walter’s actions.

4) BUG has come to you for advice regarding interstate and international e-commerce. BUG wants to sell its products via the Internet. BUG is concerned about privacy, security, infringement issues, and email contract validity. BUG is also concerned because a company that buys famous and/or company name domain names seems to own the rights to the domain name BUG.com. The company is willing to sell the domain name for a high price. Advise BUG on all e-commerce issues that could possibly affect the company. Be detailed in your response.

5) Shady Town, U.S.A. has been plagued with a recent crime wave. The BUG plant in Shady Town has experienced vandalized vehicles in its parking lot and some second shift employees have been robbed as they walked to their cars at night. BUG receives shipments of parts and other items from vendors at its receiving/shipping dock located at the rear of each plant. The parking lot and dock areas are well lit; however, some lights are now out. While waiting for the dock manager to return from lunch, a vendor was attacked and robbed of his wallet and the electronic chips he was delivering.

a) Discuss what, if any, tort liability BUG may have to the vendor and to the BUG employees that were attacked. Explain your answer.

b) What defenses may be available to BUG? Explain your answer.

6) (See situations b.-1) and b.-3) for background information.) The attorneys for BUG have completed their investigation of WIRETAP and its employee, Steve.

a) If they want to bring a successful action against WIRETAP for civil RICO, what do they need to prove?

b) What type(s) of damages could BUG receive?

7) Sally DoGood, a police officer in Shady Town, was sitting in a police van monitoring wiretaps placed in the Crime Boss hideout. The equipment she was using, which was an older model purchased from BUG, short-circuited and injured Sally. An insulator that could have prevented the possibility of shorts was not included in the original design because of its effect on production costs. The newer models, not yet purchased by the Shady Town Police, have the insulator installed. What tort(s) may Sally have for a successful case against BUG? Explain your answer(s).
 


   
   
   
   
 
Available Tutorials to this Question
Posted by:
Rhemsis
Rhemsis
Rating (38): C-
Questions Asked: 0
Tutorials Posted: 54, earned $2,251.15
 

$40.00 Bug Inc.

  • This tutorial was purchased 2 times and hasn't been rated yet.
  • Posted on May 19, 2008 at 6:15:35PM
A:
Preview: ... lengthy and complex due to their nature and the amount of witnesses and information that must be obtained. The purpose of the RICO act is to liable the enterprise, BUG, Inc., and the person whom is committing the wrongful act, Steve. In the case of the RICO act with regards to BUG, Inc. versus WIRETAP, WIRETAP must prove that Bug, Inc., played a substantial role in Steve conspiring to retrieve confidential information from WIRETAP. In addition to this, it must be proven that there was some kind of motivation for Steve to be sent to the other company as a . There must be a considerable case made by WIRETAP to prove that the company BUG, Inc. had any involvement with Steves indiscretions. For example, Steve continuing to be on the payroll at BUG, Inc. while employed at WIRETAP, proof of forwarding emails to executives at BUG, witness testimony that Steve was endorsed for employment at WIRETAP by BUG, and proof of possible blackmail rewards for retrieving information for BUG, Inc.. <br><br>WIRETAP and the Security Guard<br>Walter, who is a security guard for BUG, Inc., realized that Steve was working for WIRETAP at the same time as working for BUG and made the decision to detain Steve in a small soundproof room for six hours in order to find out Steves purpose at BUG. Walter could have put himself in danger of committing torts by falsely imprisoning Steve against his will. False imprisonment is described as the intentional confinement or restraint of another person without authority or justification and without that persons consent.(Cheeseman, 2004) Although Walter is a security guard for BUG, it does not give him the right to detain Steve in a room while interrogating him.<br>Another crime committed by Walter in this scenario is assault. While Walter had Steve in the soundproof room, he threatened Steve that he would hurt him if Steve does not confess everything to him. Assault is described as (1) the threat of immediate harm or offensive contact, or (2) any action that arouses reasonable apprehension of imminent harm. Actual physical contact is unnecessary. (Cheeseman, 2004) Although Walter did not act on his threat, he still could face assault charges because the fact that he presented the intent to harm him and Steve responded to the fearful situation. ...

The full tutorial is about 1876 words long plus attachments.

Attachments:
buginc.doc (18K) (Preview)
Posted by:
Aks21
Aks21
Rating (351): B-
Questions Asked: 6
Tutorials Posted: 1063, earned $16,637.40
 

$40.00 BUG Inc. Complete Analysis

  • This tutorial was purchased 1 time and hasn't been rated yet.
  • Posted on May 24, 2008 at 09:24:47PM
A:
Preview: ... lease fin ...

The full tutorial is about 8 words long plus attachments.

Attachments:
BUG_Law.doc (40K) (Preview)
Posted by:
 

$40.00 Bug Inc

  • This tutorial was purchased 1 time and hasn't been rated yet.
  • Posted on May 26, 2008 at 3:17:32PM
A:
Preview: ... nt so this type of conduct won’t happen again.<br>If BUG, Inc. wants to bring a successful action against wiretap for civil Rico, it needs to prove the equipment that is being driven by the software is written by BUG employees. BUG, Inc. needs to prove the electronic devices being used by the law enforcement agencies telephone that wires, cell phones, etc. is a product manufactured by BUG. <br>Types of damage that bug might receive is that the whole company might go under stress and there might be a possibility that if the employees will be laid off due to this situation.<br>Shady town, U. S. A. has been plagued with a recent crime wave. The BUG plant in Shady Town has experienced vandalized vehicles in its parking lot and some second shift employees have been robbed as they walked to their cars at night. BUG receives shipments of parts and other items from vendors at its receiving/shipping dock located at the rear of each plant. The parking lot and dock area are well lit; however, some lights are now out. While waiting for the dock manager to return from lunch, a vendor was attacked and robbed of his wallet and the electronic chips he was delivering.<br>BUG, Inc may be sued for negligence by the employees and the vendor whom were robbed in the parking lot and dock area. Duty of care is the responsibilities held by individuals towards other individuals within society. BUG Inc. did not exercise a duty of care by providing efficient lighting and security in the areas. BUG Inc. was aware of the robberies on their property. Taking some precautions may have det ...

The full tutorial is about 1323 words long plus attachments.

Attachments:
BUG Inc.doc (33K) (Preview)
Posted by:
speedtype
speedtype
Rating (444): A-
Questions Asked: 0
Tutorials Posted: 793, earned $39,925.32
 

$41.00 Bug Inc.

  • This tutorial was purchased 2 times and hasn't been rated yet.
  • Posted on May 26, 2008 at 8:40:02PM
A:
Preview: ... rotected in secure database. Constant monitoring and timely modification of code, to avoid breaches should be considered too.<br><br><br>A lawsuit could be filed against Bug Inc. by either of their employees. They could file the case on the fact that Bug Inc. does not have enough security and proper lightings in the parking lot. If Bug Inc. had installed additional cameras, proper lightings and security guards, their employees would have been safer, and because of this fact, its employees and vendor could contest. Moreover, Bug Inc. could be found responsible for paying compensations and punitive damages to employees and vendors respectively. If the place of attack does not come under Bug Inc.’s property then it could be partially offset responsibility. But, if it does, then employees and vendors has a potential strong case against Bug Inc. To avoid such attacks or damages in future Bug Inc. should utilize more video cameras, security guards and additional lighting. <br><br><br><br>Racketeering and Influenced Corrupt Organization (RICO) law is extremely complex that was passed to ...

The full tutorial is about 855 words long plus attachments.

Attachments:
Bug Inc.doc (25K) (Preview)
   
Join Now or Log In
Get Tutoring
Get Paid
Academic Honesty