Question
Asked by:
carrieanna
carrieanna
Rating : No Rating
Questions Asked: 583
Tutorials Posted: 0
 

$1.00 DQ 2 week 6 crt 205

  • From Business: General-Business
  • Closed, but you can still post tutorials
  • Due on Mar. 02, 2009
  • Asked on Jan 30, 2009 at 12:46:06PM
Q:
I need help on DQ 2 week 6.
Imagine your child is trying to prove that she did not steal chocolate chip cookies from the cookie jar, so she makes this argument: There are no chocolate stains on my hands, so I couldn’t have stolen the cookies. Post your response to the following: Does this example require deductive or inductive logic? What are the premises? Are the premises stated or unstated? What is the argument’s conclusion? In your opinion, is this a convincing argument? Why or why not?
 


   
   
   
   
 
Available Tutorials to this Question
Posted by:
linksysrouter
linksysrouter
Rating (961): A-
Questions Asked: 9
Tutorials Posted: 3487, earned $22,767.05
 

$3.00 DQ2 Week 6 CRT 205 A+

  • This tutorial hasn't been purchased yet.
  • Posted on Jan 30, 2009 at 12:50:06PM
A:
Preview: ... ldnt have stolen the cookies. It is not a convincing argument. The child could have wiped his or her hands on a pa ...

The full tutorial is about 112 words long .
Posted by:
angelsnana
angelsnana
Rating (160): A-
Questions Asked: 59
Tutorials Posted: 1251, earned $4,621.32
 

$3.55 DQ 2 week 6 crt 205

  • This tutorial hasn't been purchased yet.
  • Posted on Jan 30, 2009 at 12:54:57PM
A:
Preview: ... f the child had said they were upstairs when the cookies were taken would be a stronger argument. I do not believe that this is a convincing argument because all it would take is a little soap and water to remove the evidence ...

The full tutorial is about 225 words long plus attachments.

Attachments:
CRT 205 Week 6 DQ 2.doc (25K) (Preview)
Posted by:
barbdog12
barbdog12
Rating (236): A-
Questions Asked: 12
Tutorials Posted: 994, earned $6,715.49
 

$2.00 crt 205 week 6 DQ2 Cookie question. A++

  • This tutorial hasn't been purchased yet.
  • Posted on Jan 30, 2009 at 1:09:44PM
A:
Preview: ... nclusion is induced from the premise of the argument. Since there are no stains the child couldnt have stolen the cookies. The unstated premises in the argument are that the child did not have the time or the means to clean their hands before they were caught. There is no evidence of chocolate any other place like the childs clothes or face. Another uns ...

The full tutorial is about 310 words long .
Posted by:
barbdog12
barbdog12
Rating (236): A-
Questions Asked: 12
Tutorials Posted: 994, earned $6,715.49
 

$4.00 Crt 205 Week 6 DQ1 and 2 A++

  • This tutorial hasn't been purchased yet.
  • Posted on Jan 30, 2009 at 1:13:43PM
A:
Preview: ... eaner. You certainly look like someone who likes having a really clean home. So, you definitely need this vacuum cleaner! The conclusion to the salesmans argument is true only if the premises of the argument are true. The second sentence of the salesmans argument may or may not be true. The man that he is trying to sale the vacuum too may not like having a clean home. The man may not even be the one responsible for cleaning the home or taking care of anything. The mans wife may be responsible for everything, the salesman doesnt know. The wife makes the sound argument to her husband stating, Honey, our carpets are clean and we already have a working vacuum cleaner. We dont need a ne ...

The full tutorial is about 628 words long .
Posted by:
mommaof3
mommaof3
Rating (429): A
Questions Asked: 18
Tutorials Posted: 784, earned $14,064.79
 

$5.00 Crt week 6 DQ 1 & 2 help

  • This tutorial hasn't been purchased yet.
  • Posted on Jan 30, 2009 at 7:38:12PM
A:
Preview: ... gument is more effective if it is sound rather than valid because it is difficult to argue with a sound argument. An argument based on fact ( a sound argument) will always prevail when argued against a valid argument.<br><br>DQ 2:<br><br>There are no chocolate stains on my hands, so I couldnt have stolen the cookies. <br>This argument requires inductive reasoning. My reasoni ...

The full tutorial is about 318 words long plus attachments.

Attachments:
CRT205 week6 DQ#1 & 2 help.doc (27K) (Preview)
Posted by:
smartcat
smartcat
Rating (1713): A+
Questions Asked: 0
Tutorials Posted: 6036, earned $46,994.03
 

$4.00 DQ 21 and 2 week 6 crt 205-Always an A+++ Work!!

  • This tutorial hasn't been purchased yet.
  • Posted on Jan 30, 2009 at 7:38:38PM
A:
Preview: ... post has been grade A++ work or it would be not posted o ...

The full tutorial is about 56 words long plus attachments.

Attachments:
Malika Moretti-6CRT DQ 1.doc (29K) (Preview)
Malika Moretti6-CRT DQ 2.doc (26K) (Preview)
Posted by:
mommaof3
mommaof3
Rating (429): A
Questions Asked: 18
Tutorials Posted: 784, earned $14,064.79
 

$3.00 DQ 2

  • This tutorial was purchased 1 time and rated A+ by students like you.
  • Posted on Jan 30, 2009 at 7:39:16PM
A:
Preview: ... ive argument is strong and supports its conclusion whereas a deductive reasoning argument proves its conclusion. <br><br>The stated premise in this argument is there are no chocolate stains ...

The full tutorial is about 160 words long .
Posted by:
Samanthab21
Samanthab21
Rating (426): A+
Questions Asked: 0
Tutorials Posted: 938, earned $13,411.12
 

$2.00 CRT 205 - Week 6 - DQ 2 --- A+ Work & A in Class!

  • This tutorial hasn't been purchased yet.
  • Posted on Jan 30, 2009 at 11:18:50PM
A:
Preview: ... xample of inductive logic. The premises are that the child has no chocolate stains on her hands and that she did not handle the cookies. I think the premises are mostly unstated; the child is saying that if she had handled the cookies, she would therefore have chocolate stains on her hands - she only mentions that she has no stains (and does not mention directly the handling of the cookies). The arguments conclusion is that the child did not ...

The full tutorial is about 327 words long .
Posted by:
ssff1970
ssff1970
Rating (458): A-
Questions Asked: 11
Tutorials Posted: 1753, earned $16,248.69
 

$2.00 CRT 205 -Week 6 - Discussion Question 2 --A++

  • This tutorial hasn't been purchased yet.
  • Posted on Jan 31, 2009 at 01:23:47PM
A:
Preview: ... 2 --A++CRT 205 -Week 6 - Discussion ...

The full tutorial is about 33 words long plus attachments.

Attachments:
Week 6 - Discussion Question 2.doc (36K) (Preview)
Posted by:
coroleva
coroleva
Rating (2697): A
Questions Asked: 2
Tutorials Posted: 7092, earned $93,592.84
 

$1.00 CRT205 Week 6 DQ 2

  • This tutorial hasn't been purchased yet.
  • Posted on Feb 06, 2009 at 05:31:36PM
A:
Preview: ... What are the premises? There are no chocolate stains on my hands. If I ate cookies, there would have to be chocolate on my (the childs) hands.<br> Are the premises stated or unstated? (Stated) there are no chocolate stains on my hands. ( ...

The full tutorial is about 211 words long .
Posted by:
jannwith3
jannwith3
Rating (353): A-
Questions Asked: 182
Tutorials Posted: 950, earned $3,162.13
 

$1.00 DQ 2 week 6 crt 205-I recieved an A+ in this class.

  • This tutorial hasn't been purchased yet.
  • Posted on Feb 19, 2009 at 1:00:04PM
A:
Preview: ... he premises arechocolate chip cookies stains your hands if you take them and there are no ch ...

The full tutorial is about 77 words long .
Posted by:
michyluv
michyluv
Rating (7): A+
Questions Asked: 0
Tutorials Posted: 57, earned $103.08
 

$1.50 DQ 2 week 6 crt 205

  • This tutorial hasn't been purchased yet.
  • Posted on Feb 26, 2009 at 10:52:55PM
A:
Preview: ... te stains would be left on her hands. The arguments conclusion is that the girl could not have stolen the cookies. I believe this is not a convincing argument ...

The full tutorial is about 138 words long .
   
Join Now or Log In
Get Tutoring
Get Paid
Academic Honesty