MGT 255 - StudentOfFortune.com

Question

Asked by:

Mysterldy
Rating : No Rating
Questions Asked: 18
Tutorials Posted: 0

$20.00 MGT 255

From Business: General-Business
Closed, but you can still post tutorials
Due on Apr. 12, 2009
Asked on Apr 09, 2009 at 7:51:24PM

Q:
Compile a case portfolio of seven personally briefed business law cases. Include one case from each of these topics:
1. Basic Business* 2. Real Properties* 3. Intellectual Properties* 4. Business and the Bill of Rights 5. Administrative Agency 6. Torts Relating to Business 7. Contracts
Answer the questions found in Appendix A for each type of brief.
Note: *The first three briefs and follow-up questions have already been answered throughout class and students have the option of revising briefs already submitted in order to gain maximum points on the final project.
Submit your case portfolio as an attachment.

Attachments:

Available Tutorials to this Question

Posted by:

justlikethat
Rating (52): C-
Questions Asked: 183
Tutorials Posted: 317, earned $1,030.67

$20.00 PERFECT A+ SOLUTION

This tutorial hasn't been purchased yet.
Posted on Apr 09, 2009 at 8:23:46PM

A:
Preview: ... dvanced Global Technology v. Sirius Satellite Radio, ---N.Y.S.2d--- (2007 WL 764710, Sup. Ct., N.Y., 2007 Facts: Sirins operates satellite radio service and makes receivers for transmission. It authorizes other companies to make and sell receivers under its brand. One company KRI, which is making such receivers, gets an offer from a competitor AGT to make high definition receivers; Sirins objects to such an agreements. AGT sues Sirins for interference. Issue: Has Sirins interfered in the business transaction between KRI and AGT? Ruling: No, the court ruled that there was no tort committed by Sirins. Analysis: By prevailing on KRI to break off the discussion with AGT, Sirins had not committed a tort. For interference to take place, AGT must show that it was in a business relationship with KRI, that interference by Sirins was impinging on those relations, that purpose of Sirins was to harm AGT and Sirins has caused injury to the business relationship. As these points have not been proved the complaint was dismissed. Minority Rationale(s): If AGT can show that it had a business relationship with KRI and Sirins had a harmful intent then the court would have taken a different stand. Comments: Protecting one's business interest through legal means does cause a tort. Questions: 1. What kinds of torts involve primarily businesses? Misrepresentation, fraud, tortuous interference with contracts, and trade secrets. 2. Explain the concept of warranties; describe the different types and how they are applied to products. A warranty is an obligation that a product will perform what it is meant to do. There is an explicit warranty and an implied warranty. If there is a two year warranty against manufacturing defects, the seller is responsible for it. 3. When is liability imposed? What the warranty fails. For instance, a product under one year's warranty against ...

The full tutorial is about 1558 words long .

Posted by:

mellisa

Rating (124): A-
Questions Asked: 27
Tutorials Posted: 462, earned $2,897.88

$30.00 best answers for 4th ,5th ,6th and 7th

This tutorial hasn't been purchased yet.
Posted on Apr 09, 2009 at 8:26:35PM

A:
Preview: ... ee the f ...

The full tutorial is about 8 words long plus attachments.

Attachments:
bill of rights.doc (31K) (Preview)